IF I HAD ONLY ONE SERMON TO PREACH A Sermon by Kenneth W. Phifer Delivered at First UU Congregation of Ann Arbor July 31, 2005 “What if I had only one sermon to preach” is a question working preachers often think about. It is a way of focusing our minds on what really matters. If we had only one sermon to preach, we would want every word to be a pearl of wisdom, a gem of moral insight and inspiration, and a comfort to those suffering from the travails of life on that day. Of course, today I really do have only one sermon to preach, that is, only one sermon to preach as your senior minister before retiring. For some time now, knowing this day was coming, I have been collecting various tidbits about valedictory sermons. Before offering some of that homiletical potpourri to you, let me share with you a comment about preaching made by Anthony Trollope in his novel BARCHESTER TOWERS. “There is,” Trollope wrote, “perhaps, no greater hardship on mankind in civilized and free countries than the necessity of listening to sermons. No one but a preaching clergyman has, in these realms, the power of compelling an audience to sit silent, and be tormented.” I, of course, have no power to compel you to do anything, but I shall strive not to torment you. If I fail in this, I do hope that you will choose to be silent. I also hope that you will stay, as on one memorable Sunday several years ago well over a dozen people chose not to. They left in the middle of the sermon. As part of a fund-raising campaign, I had included in my remarks some thoughts about the importance of money and of our being generous in our pledges to the congregation. As I drew near the close of these pecuniary observations, people from different places in the sanctuary began to stand up and walk out. I assumed that talk of money was too uncomfortable for these people. Still, more than a dozen people removing themselves seemed a bit excessive. I promised myself a thorough review of what I had said and a serious discussion with the board about whether I should ever talk about money again. It was only at the coffee hour that one of the people who had left apologized to me for her departure, explaining that her child’s religious education class was having a special presentation and the teachers had asked that the parents come for that part of the class! They all did! As regards wisdom about last sermons, one preacher of my acquaintance preached his last sermon, though the congregation did not know it was his last, announced at the close of the sermon that he was retiring effective immediately, walked out of the sanctuary, and never returned. As you know, I chose a somewhat longer time line of giving notice of my retirement. Another colleague, Tom Goldsmith, a good many years away from retirement, observed in one of his newsletter columns how impressed he was with the retirement ritual of Rulon Gardner, an Olympic medallist in Graeco-Roman wrestling. When Gardner finished his last match in the Olympics, he removed his shoes and left them in the center of the mat. Goldsmith suggests preachers could remove their shoes and leave them in the pulpit. For me, it might be more appropriate to leave my socks or my tie behind! David Bumbaugh, retiring from the Summit, New Jersey UU congregation, wrote about a preacher’s last sermon that “we sometimes imagine ourselves delivering the definitive sermon—an apostolic summing up of all our passions and convictions in one twenty minute masterpiece. But confronted with the necessity of offering that final sermon, I find that what I have to say is not the masterpiece I had hoped for. Indeed, it’s rather ordinary and unimaginative.” So it is with me. I wanted a sermon full of phrases that would echo down the years in your minds and hearts. What I have actually done is nothing extraordinary. It really is just more of the same that I have been doing for 25 years, trying with at best limited success to find words to express deep truths, ethical wisdom, spiritual understanding, practical helpfulness. Week after week, not really succeeding, I’ve had to try again. The work of the preacher, my work, reminds me of a story told by Saul Bellow of a young opera singer making her debut at La Scala. After a particularly beautiful but difficult aria, the applause was thunderous and there were cries of encore, do it again. After the fourth such encore, worn out from the challenging music sung again and yet again, she asked her audience how many more times she must sing. A voice cried out, “Until you get it right!” There’s a sense in which every preacher, certainly this one, really only has one sermon. Each week we ring the changes on it, but it’s the same fundamental message. Each week, we hope, I hope, we’ll get it right. This is my last chance to get it right. I suspect I will not succeed any more than I have in the past. At least in part, that is a reflection of the profound and noble themes with which we as a congregation and we UU’s as a movement attempt to deal. When we struggle with the really big ideas, the great virtues, the complex and troubling issues, no one individual, no one group can ever get it completely right. Life is a constant process of learning. In that spirit, I offer these thoughts. Of course, there are three of them. The first thought is the importance of history. I majored in history in college because I saw history as an academic discipline within which I could study virtually anything. My doctoral work in Christian antisemitism continued this interest in the historical as the human arena within which all subjects could be studied. As I began the process of moving into Unitarian Universalism, one of the most attractive features of the movement was its attitude towards history. In UU understanding, history, human experience, is where we find authority for our theologies and our moral values. UU’s see past, present, and future linked together without thinking that one part of history is more important than another. All three matter. All are intertwined. All affect the other. What we know and think about the past helps us to live in the present and plan for the future. How we live in the present helps us to redeem the past and shape the future. How we dream of and work for the future helps us to live meaningfully today and to accept the past. This is in contrast to an orthodox understanding of history where some person, event, or revelation in the past is determinative. In the past is all the truth that matters, says the orthodox believer. The radical says that the most important moment is yet to be. Despise the past and present and look to the future, says the radical. Christopher Buice, a UU minister in Knoxville, Tennessee, captures the spirit of the UU approach to history when he writes of bowling as a spiritual discipline. Bowl a ball too far to the right and you end up in the gutter of orthodoxy, trapped in the past. Bowl too far to the left and you end up in the gutter of radicalism, postponing a good life to a never-to-arrive future. To knock down the pins, you must strive to roll your ball in the lane between the gutters. The Buddha taught that same wisdom: seek the Middle Way between the extremes that seem so tempting. Aristotle called it the Golden Mean. UU’s respect the past, knowing in what measure it affects our lives. Our genetic inheritance, the social history of our species, and the environmental developments of the ages that have produced our present earth all have significance for us. Historian Donald Kagan says that writers of history have “the responsibility of preserving the great, important and instructive actions of human beings.” By knowing what has happened, we can see what good and evil are, what actions help human beings and what actions harm us. History shows us clearly the wickedness of slavery and the oppression of women, the folly of war and of designing societies that are unjust so a few get rich and the many live in misery. Our moral values emerge out of seeing what actions and systems do good and which ones hurt people. Then we build a vision of what might be and begin working to realize it. We understand the truth of Reinhold Niebuhr’s words: “Nothing worth doing is completed in our lifetime.” Worthy goals are not easily accomplished. The time to start working on them is now. We must do what we can, even if we do not see the completion of the task, and trust that others will carry on the work to make real the vision of a peaceable and just community. What this congregation has done over the past decade and more in moving to this vast land site and putting up our building in two stages is grounded in our appreciation of our past and the vision of what we can become and offer to the world in the future. We did not complete the task. We are still working on the master site plan. There is money owed, a lot of money. But we have a facility and a staff that can serve a much large number of people and have a much greater influence for good in the world. This congregation has lived the power of history. History is about two things: remembering and dreaming. We remember so that we can overcome the mistakes of the past and carry forward the noblest aspirations of humanity. We dream so that we never become complacent about who and what we are, always striving to be better and help the world to be better. History is the first point. Humility is the second. Humility is an impossible virtue. How on earth can we ever know if we are properly humble? If I go on a diet, I have something to measure how well I am doing. How many times do I succumb and have that blueberry pie or reuben sandwich? How many days do I not exercise? I can keep a chart of how I am doing and give myself pep talks about doing better. How do we tell if we are improving in humility? How do we know if our humble demeanor is not really a mask for vanity and arrogance? I have never thought of myself as a particularly humble person, and I am not sure if that means that I am or that I am not humble! I just do not know. I am persuaded that humility is a great virtue. I like what Max Ehrmann said about humility in DESIDERATA, though he did not use the word. He wrote that “If you compare yourself with others, you may become vain and bitter; for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.” That’s excellent advice for staying on course—the middle way!—but hard as the dickens to do. Most of us at one time or another do compare ourselves and find ourselves desperately wanting or wallowing in self-admiration. Ehrmann was right to caution against it. The trick is to appreciate ourselves, respect others, and enjoy life. Several things can be helpful in doing this. First, I cannot imagine anyone who is not humbled by an awareness of the sheer vastness of the universe. Hundreds of billions of stars in our galaxy which is one of hundreds of billions of galaxies. In the microscopic world, we seem to keep discovering teeny, tiny, minuscule little things that count as fundamental pieces of the make-up of physical reality. The last count I saw was 64 such elemental pieces. There is vastness in time also, billions and billions of years of time that the earth has been around, billions and billions of years since the universe started, and who knows what came before that point of singularity. My goodness! How could anybody be uppity in the face of that knowledge! The world of which we are a part is also strange. Beetles seem to be the most prolific life form with 400,000 species. Cockroaches seem to be the most durable form of life, said to be capable of surviving and prospering in a nuclear war. Giraffes! Hippopotamuses! Duck-billed platypuses! Monkey pod trees! Roses and thorns! Mountains! Water! The human being! Life is strange and beautiful, full of mystery. One last element of humility is the limits that constrain us. The first and most painful of these limits is our mortality. Religions may propose faith commitments about living beyond this life, but there is not one scrap of evidence that we do. Even if we survive for another go-round—and I would welcome that, as most people would—that does not make this life any easier. Here’s the truth about our mortality, told in two statements a quipster thought up in the heyday of the God Is Dead movement of the 1960’s. First came these words, “God is dead—Nietzsche.” Then came these words, “Nietzsche is dead—God.” Whatever we consider the ultimate force of the universe to be, whatever our God is, it will long outlast our very short existence. There are limits as well in what we can do. Like it or not, and no matter how hard I might apply myself, I will never be able to play the piano as well as Fats Waller or Van Cliburn. For that matter, I can’t play as well as Fats Cliburn or Van Waller either! Very few are those gifted in all aspects of life. Some of us can cook and some of us cannot. Some of us are comfortable and capable with technology and others of us are not. Some of us are good with numbers and others of us are not. Some of us can hit a curve ball and others cannot. Nobody does everything well. Humility is an attitude firmly rooted in the reality of our situation, an infinitesimal part of life in a vast space-time universe in which our mortal days are few and our talents limited. Accepting our real condition frees us to enjoy life, to appreciate what we have rather than long for what we do not have, to respect others and take delight in their accomplishments. In the UU movement, humility is part of the reason why we have no binding dogmas, no required creeds to believe, no rituals one must perform on pain of eternal loss. Humility teaches us that no one of us has the truth, no individual, no religion. At best, we may each have a little bit of the truth. Sharing humbly we can enlarge our understanding. Humility is the reason we celebrate diversity. Humility is the second point. The third is this: learning to distinguish between that which endures and that which is of passing value. One of the watershed moments in UU history was the occasion of the installation of the Rev. Charles C. Shackford on May 19, 1841. At that ceremony, Theodore Parker preached a sermon called “The Transient and Permanent in Christianity.” Parker made the point that the authority of Christianity or of any religion rests on the truth of its words and deeds, not on who said the words nor on any doctrines of the faith. Doctrines are transient. So are rituals. So are people. The permanent is found in love and morality and divine living, acting on the goodness that is part of every one of us. Parker said that what is demanded of us is “a divine life; doing the best thing, in the best way, from the highest motives.” He went on to note that living in this way does not “demand that all men…(and women) think alike, but to think uprightly, and get as near as possible to truth; not all men…(and women) to live alike, but to live holy, and get as near as possible to a life perfectly divine.” There are many ways of speaking the wisdom found in Parker’s words. You have often heard me quote Micah, that what is required of us is not rituals or doctrines, but “to do justice, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.” Jesus said that we should love our enemies and the Koran instructs us in the many ways Allah’s voice can be heard, different voices in different places to different people. The permanent is about love and morality, not about transient things. We live in an age that celebrates the transient. A cartoon in this week’s New Yorker underscores this. It shows a man being held up on the street, and the hold-up man saying, “Hand over your most recently acquired technology.” Not even the thieves can keep up with the passing array of technological gimcrackery that crowds our lives and demands our attention. It’s all very exciting and all very lucrative for the sellers and all very temporary. What religions do is to remind us of what we need, remind us of the things that endure, the things that really matter, like love and morality, like justice and compassion, like laughter and learning, like sharing and hope, like respect and thoughtfulness. At the recent commencement exercises at my alma mater, the actor John Lithgow, a member of the class of 1967, spoke of what he had learned from some of the recipients of the Harvard Arts Medal, awarded each year at the springtime Arts First festival that Lithgow founded. “I began to see, “ he said, “ that many of the qualities that made them great artists were the same qualities that made them good people.” He then referred to folksinger Pete Seeger, who spearheaded efforts to clean up the Hudson River, to blues guitarist and singer Bonnie Raitt, who donated funds for guitar lessons for inner-city kids, and filmmaker Mira Nair, who started a film school in Uganda. He then suggested very briefly four qualities these and others who have contributed to the welfare of humanity have. He urged his audience—he urged us all—to “be creative, to be useful, to be practical, and to be generous.” That is wisdom that fits any age, truth that endures. So is the kind of celebration of life that the poet Mary Oliver expresses in her poems, like this one, “Some things, say the wise ones who know everything, are not living. I say, You live your life your way and leave me alone. I have talked with the faint clouds in the sky when they are afraid of being left behind; I have said, Hurry, hurry! and they have said, Thank you, we are hurrying. About cows, and starfish, and roses there is no argument. They die, after all. But water is a question, so many living things in it, but what is it in itself, living or not? Oh, gleaming generosity, how can they write you out? As I think this I am sitting on the sand beside the harbor. I am holding in my hand small pieces of granite, pyrite, schist. Each one, just now, so thoroughly asleep. Some Things Say the Wise Ones Mary Oliver To see the sacredness in every part of life, to really live the truth of being part of the “interdependent web of all existence,” is to be in tune with the universe, with that which goes on, with that which endures. The third point is that we should seek out and hold on to the permanent values of life and take lightly the transient things. Hold fast to love, morality, life. The humorist Art Buchwald once delivered a commencement address in these words: “Graduates, we the older generation are leaving you a perfect world. Don’t louse it up.” Then he sat down. I’ve not been as brief as Mr. Buchwald, but, like him, I probably should sit down, or at least shut up. Unlike him, I cannot say that I am leaving a perfect world or even a perfect congregation. There is work to be done. There will always be work to be done. Only in fantasies and occasional magical moments do we see perfection. Our responsibility is nevertheless to keep working for it. Henri Nouwen, in an afterword to one of his books, expressed what I feel as I end my ministry with you: “Do not stop here. Continue on your own. My words were only to encourage you to find your own words, and my thoughts were only to help you discover your own thoughts.” My thoughts two weeks ago were about the stories we tell, and last week about the principles by which we live. Today I have tried to suggest that we live best by living in history, by living humbly, and by living with permanent values like love and morality. That is really all I have been saying for 25 years, my one sermon. In that time, if I may be so bold, we have had a good relationship. I believe that is because we have both loved and challenged each other. If we did not love each other, our challenges would become harsh and judgmental. If we did not challenge each other, our love would become sentimental and lazy. I believe that by both loving and challenging each other, we have done good for each other and for the world. Thank you for all that you have done, for all that you are, for all that you have given, for all that you do to make the world a better place. Know that you will be in my heart and my mind forever. Thank you! Thank you very much! Copyright 2005, Kenneth W. Phifer, All Rights Reserved